Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- bmas [2026/06/19 15:44] – [Abstract] pedroortega
+++ bmas [2026/06/20 13:18] (current) – [Safe AI Should be Bounded and Multi-Agent] pedroortega
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Safe AI Should be Bounded and Multi-Agent ======
-**David Hyland, Daniel Jarne Ornia, Nicholas Bishop, Joel Dyer, Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Tomáš Gaveniak, Ani Calinescu, Michael Wooldridge, Fernando Rosas, Pedro Ortega**
+**David Hyland, Daniel Jarne Ornia, Nicholas Bishop, Joel Dyer, Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Tomáš Gaveniak, Ani Calinescu, Michael Wooldridge, Fernando Rosas, Pedro A. Ortega**
 //Keywords: AI safety, bounded agency, multi-agent systems, modularity, verification, governance. //
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 BMAS starts from a different decomposition. A task induces a capability profile: reasoning, knowledge, coding, planning, tool use, verification, and communication may all be required in different proportions. Unsafe behaviour also has a capability profile. Risk is highest when the capabilities required for task completion and the capabilities required for harm are colocated in one agent.
-The BMAS proposal is to design systems in which useful capability is distributed across bounded components. A planner plans. A retriever retrieves. A coder writes code. A verifier checks outputs. A monitor inspects interactions. An executor acts under controlled authority. The system becomes capable through composition, while each component has a restricted scope.
+The BMAS proposal is to design systems in which useful capability is distributed across bounded components. A planner plans. A retriever retrieves. A coder writes code. A verifier checks outputs. A monitor inspects interactions. An executor acts under controlled authority. And so forth. The system becomes capable through composition, while each component has a restricted scope.
 ===== Bounded agents =====