robustness

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
robustness [2025/03/30 18:16] – [The Robustness Agenda: Embrace Unpredictability, Manage by Outcomes] pedroortegarobustness [2025/03/30 19:48] (current) pedroortega
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 ====== Beyond Alignment: Robustness in AI Safety ====== ====== Beyond Alignment: Robustness in AI Safety ======
 +
 +> Advanced AI is highly adaptable yet inherently unpredictable, making it nearly impossible to embed a fixed set of human values from the start. Traditional alignment methods fall short because AI can reinterpret its goals dynamically, so instead, we need a robustness approach—one that emphasizes continuous oversight, rigorous stress-testing, and outcome-based regulation. This strategy mirrors how we manage human unpredictability, keeping human responsibility at the forefront and ensuring that we can react quickly and effectively when AI behavior deviates.
  
 Pluripotent technologies possess transformative, open-ended capabilities that go far beyond the narrow functions of traditional tools. For instance, stem cell technology exemplifies this idea: stem cells can be induced to develop into virtually any cell type. Unlike conventional technologies designed for specific tasks, pluripotent systems can learn and adapt to perform a multitude of functions. This flexibility, however, comes with a trade-off: while they dynamically respond to varying stimuli and needs, their behavior is inherently less predictable and more challenging to constrain in advance. Pluripotent technologies possess transformative, open-ended capabilities that go far beyond the narrow functions of traditional tools. For instance, stem cell technology exemplifies this idea: stem cells can be induced to develop into virtually any cell type. Unlike conventional technologies designed for specific tasks, pluripotent systems can learn and adapt to perform a multitude of functions. This flexibility, however, comes with a trade-off: while they dynamically respond to varying stimuli and needs, their behavior is inherently less predictable and more challenging to constrain in advance.
Line 34: Line 36:
  
 Consider the impact of advanced AI on our society. If human intelligence once served as the inscrutable force that kept us on our toes, AI is emerging as the lamp that illuminates its inner workings. Modern AI systems can model, predict, and even manipulate human behavior in ways that challenge core Enlightenment ideals like free will and privacy. By processing vast amounts of data —from our browsing histories and purchase patterns to social media activity and biometric information— AI begins to decode the complexities of individual decision-making. Consider the impact of advanced AI on our society. If human intelligence once served as the inscrutable force that kept us on our toes, AI is emerging as the lamp that illuminates its inner workings. Modern AI systems can model, predict, and even manipulate human behavior in ways that challenge core Enlightenment ideals like free will and privacy. By processing vast amounts of data —from our browsing histories and purchase patterns to social media activity and biometric information— AI begins to decode the complexities of individual decision-making.
 +
 +{{ ::panoption.webp |}}
  
 This is not science fiction; it is unfolding before our eyes. Targeted advertising algorithms now pinpoint our vulnerabilities (be it a late-night snack craving or an impulsive purchase) more adeptly than any human salesperson. Political micro-targeting leverages psychological profiles to tailor messages intended to sway votes. Critics warn that once governments or corporations learn to "hack" human behavior, they could not only predict our choices but also reshape our emotions. With ever-increasing surveillance, the space for the spontaneous, uncalculated decisions that form the foundation of liberal democracy is shrinking. A perfectly timed algorithmic nudge can undermine independent judgment, challenging the idea that each individual’s free choice holds intrinsic, sovereign value. This is not science fiction; it is unfolding before our eyes. Targeted advertising algorithms now pinpoint our vulnerabilities (be it a late-night snack craving or an impulsive purchase) more adeptly than any human salesperson. Political micro-targeting leverages psychological profiles to tailor messages intended to sway votes. Critics warn that once governments or corporations learn to "hack" human behavior, they could not only predict our choices but also reshape our emotions. With ever-increasing surveillance, the space for the spontaneous, uncalculated decisions that form the foundation of liberal democracy is shrinking. A perfectly timed algorithmic nudge can undermine independent judgment, challenging the idea that each individual’s free choice holds intrinsic, sovereign value.
  • robustness.1743358601.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/03/30 18:16
  • by pedroortega